Case Law
829 cases relevant to Ontario Provincial Offences Act proceedings.
Dog Owners' Liability Act, RSO 1990, c D.16
RSO 1990, c D.16
dog attack liabilityOntario just banned pit bulls completely — and if you own one, the prosecution doesn't have to prove it's dangerous because *you* have to prove it's not a pit bull.
Durham (Regional Municipality) v d'Avernas
2007 CarswellOnt 8840
criminal chargeThe Crown fumbled their disclosure so badly that even though they had Mr. d'Avernas dead to rights, the judge threw out the case and ordered a new trial — because playing games with evidence is *never* worth the risk.
Durham v Avernas [2007] Carswell Ont 8840
Engel Brubaker
P2008-010
Privacy complaint regarding police databaseA law firm created a database to track Edmonton police officers' misconduct — and when an officer complained about his privacy, the Privacy Commissioner had to decide whether collecting dirt on cops for future court cases crosses the line.
Enverga v. Balita Newspaper
2017 ONSC 3500
contempt of courtA newspaper publisher admitted her fraud allegations against a Senator were completely false — then kept spreading them anyway, earning herself a one-way ticket to jail.
Fleming v Toronto Railway
[1911] CarswellOnt 702
negligenceWhen a streetcar exploded with electricity and injured a passenger in 1910, the railway company had inspection records to prove they weren't negligent — but the trial judge wouldn't let them use their own paperwork.
Form 9A Electronic Trust Transfer Requisition
Unreported
This isn't a court decision — it's just a blank form for electronic trust transfers that lawyers use to move client money around.
Genesis VP Directional User Manual Analysis
Decatur Electronics Manual Rev 25/Aug/2010
radar speed measurement proceduresThis official radar gun manual reveals the *exact* technical limitations and interference sources that could invalidate your speeding ticket — including the cosine effect that always reads speeds *lower* than actual.
Goodwin v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles)
2015 SCC 46
impaired drivingWhen British Columbia decided to bypass criminal court procedures with roadside breath tests that automatically triggered 90-day suspensions, the Supreme Court had to decide if a *fail* reading from a notoriously unreliable device — with no meaningful way to challenge it — violated the Charter.
Groia v LSUC [2018] SCC 27
[2018] SCC 27
Halton (Regional Municipality) v Vastis
[2008] ONCJ 44
destroying trees in environmentally sensitive areaA man cleared 25 acres of pristine forest to build what looked suspiciously like a nine-hole golf course — then told the judge he was just trying to save on property taxes.
Heegsma v. Hamilton (City)
2026 ONCA 726
Authenticated public documents still require document-specific hearsay analysis, and credibility findings cannot rest on stereotypes about mental illness or addiction.
Highway Traffic Act Section 159.1
HTA s. 159.1
Approaching stopped emergency vehicleThis *Move Over* law can cost you up to $2,000 and suspend your licence for two years — even if you just failed to change lanes when passing a stopped ambulance.
HMQ v Singh
Unreported
failing to stop for school busSingh's car was crawling behind a school bus at 10 km/h when the flashing lights came on — but the officer swore he was exactly 20 feet away, and that tiny detail destroyed the Crown's entire case.
Housen v. Nikolaisen
Jean NOLET Appeal
Komuro v. Lu
2026 ONCA 718
A court panel may set aside its own dismissal and remit the matter for an oral hearing where a party was not notified of the hearing date through no fault of their own.
Kozel v. The Personal Insurance Company
2014 ONCA 130
driving without valid licenseA 77-year-old woman's driver's license expired by four months, she crashed into a motorcyclist in Florida — and the Ontario Court of Appeal handed her a million-dollar insurance victory using a century-old legal principle.
London v Young et al
[2008] ONCA 429
various provincial offencesWhen sixteen people said nothing and did nothing in response to their tickets, the real question wasn't whether they were guilty — it was whether the province could convict them on certificates that had the wrong fine amounts, and the Court of Appeal said no.
L v Her Majesty The Queen
2009 CanLII 38516 (ON S.C.)
assault and forcible confinementA Justice of the Peace issued a bench warrant because he thought only lawyers could handle routine court appearances — but he was dead wrong about paralegals.
Macklin, Murphy and Others v R
[1838] Durham Sum. Assizes
murderWhen a mob attacked a constable with sticks, stones, and fists until he died, the judge had to explain why *everyone* in the group could be guilty of murder — even those who only threw punches.
Matheson v. Lewis
[2014] ONCA 542
operating uninsured motor vehicleA farmer driving his uninsured ATV on a public road to check his sheep got rear-ended by a truck — and the Court of Appeal had to decide whether farm equipment needs insurance or farmers get a free pass.
Ministry of Labour v Priscak
[2008] OJ No 1215
occupational health and safety violationFour construction workers nearly walked away scot-free — not because they were innocent, but because a justice of the peace threw out their tickets for failing to name the Occupational Health and Safety Act on the certificate of offence, until the Superior Court stepped in and made clear that citing the regulation is enough.
Mississauga (City) v. Ahmad
2018 ONCJ 671
driving while holding a hand-held wireless communication deviceA driver beat his cell phone ticket on appeal — not because he was innocent, but because the Justice of the Peace forgot to mention the magic words 'beyond a reasonable doubt' in her two-sentence conviction.
Page 2 of 35 · 829 cases total